Could specific gifts from will trust be undone?
The First-tier Tribunal recently considered a case where the way a will trust was administered meant that the distribution of assets was significantly different to the deceased person's intentions. Could the transactions be recharacterised?

Mr Marks (M) was the executor of his father’s estate. The deceased’s will left a number of gifts to his descendants and spouse (as life tenant), and 25% of his estate to charity, with the understanding that this would be more than sufficient to secure the lower 36% inheritance tax (IHT) rate. The problem was that following his death, the trustees of the will trust made a number of gifts to his grandchildren, purportedly as an “advance” on their eventual inheritance - reducing the residuary estate (and the value of the charitable donations). HMRC argued that the charitable contribution was less than 10% of the necessary parts of the estate, and applied the full IHT rate.
The will specified that the gift was to be 25% of the residuary estate, measured at the time of death. This meant that the 10% baseline calculation would be carried out based on the value of the assets held at death, not at the time of making the will. A deed had effectively ring-fenced a considerable portion of the money in the estate for the “specified beneficiaries”.
The grandchildren offered to repay the advances to ensure M’s intentions were met, i.e. a £250,000 legacy to the charity. The judge accepted that the gifts would not have been made had a full understanding of the IHT consequences been made clear, but this did not change the nature of the lifetime gifts and the lower rate did not apply.
This case is a reminder that it is crucial to ensure your intentions are clear when making a will, and that the persons responsible for handling your financial assets understand them. Misunderstandings with charitable bequests can often lead to protracted, and costly, litigation - though that was not the case here.
Related Topics
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?
-
How to handle workers aiming to "Slide Away" to an Oasis Concert
The Oasis Live ’25 UK reunion tour starts in Cardiff on 4 July 2025 and concludes in London on 28 September 2025. With ticketless fans keen on obtaining last-minute tickets and ticketed fans eager to get to the gig for when the gates open, this could have an impact on staff productivity and timekeeping. How can you tackle these issues?
-
Is getting your business to pay tax efficient?
You were recently involved in an online discussion about the tax consequences of putting the cost of a celebratory meal for the business owners and staff through the firm’s books. Will doing so save or increase tax overall?